|
Queens Park Hotel
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.1
Top
Based on
847
reviews
|
|
Show scores of:
|
Individual guest reviews
Reviews are ordered by language and date with a maximum of 25 reviews
|
Anonymous
Solo traveller
United Kingdom
June 25, 2009
|
the proximity to Notting Hill and Kensington Gardens, and the price I got last minute. The room was very hot and not terribly comfortable. |
6 |
|
Markus
Solo traveller
München,
Germany
June 25, 2009
|
Location is great: close to two subway stations, Hyde Park a minute away. The room size was good for a London hotel. I did not like the bugs in the bath and the room, hair on my pillow and bed, defective remote control of the TV, breakfast room just above my head (extremely noisy), light switch only(!) at the door, room in the basement - and most important: the mattress is a catastrophy. Seems to be a cheap moveable guest bed from the discounter. |
3.5 |
|
Yvonne
Young couple
Tipperary,
Ireland
June 24, 2009
|
The hotel is very central and very close to two subways,the rooms are small but clean and tidy,staff were nice and friendly. |
7.5 |
|
Ling
Solo traveller
dundee,
United Kingdom
June 21, 2009
|
good location, quite clean, but very small. |
5.5 |
|
Maria
Solo traveller
ARTEMIDA,
Greece
June 20, 2009
|
Near 2 tube stations(very good). Near shops & places to eat. Clean, but should be more. Some of the staff was nice.. Simple breakfast, wireless internet (only if you have a laptop). Should be cheaper, but it s ok according to the price. Defenately change the carpets(disgusting). Where my room was I had to walk up & down many stairs & with a heavy suitcase it was very difficult & painfull. Please ask the staff to help people when they room is in the labyrinth. I asked for an adaptor, they didn t have in reception & the employer dan attitude when I asked if he would have later. Charge 1p to keep the suitcase?! Come on.... |
5.5 |
|
Mark
Solo traveller
Newcastle upon Tyne,
United Kingdom
June 19, 2009
|
Convenience to the Underground at Queensway, and to Hyde Park and the Oxford Street shops. Reception staff courteous and efficient. There was no plug in either the washbasin or the bath! However, as there was a shower, the absence of plugs, though somewhat inconvenient, was not crucial. |
8.5 |
|
John
Mature couple
weston super mare,
United Kingdom
June 18, 2009
|
Lifts were not always working and very slow |
7 |
|
Anonymous
With friends
Ireland
June 11, 2009
|
the staff were very friendly, the room and bathroom were spotless, it was quiet and peaceful and very very good location especially for the city bus tour, tube, restaurants etc... |
10 |
|
Edward
With friends
Chester,
United Kingdom
June 4, 2009
|
It was close to most of the best sites in London and the 2 mins walk from Queensway tube, very handy. The Hotel has everything you need. And the Hotel staff will accommodate your needs. |
7 |
|
Anonymous
Solo traveller
United Kingdom
June 1, 2009
|
The bathroom was very cramped and the shower rail had been left on the floor. The shower was not very warm and flooded the floor due to the drain being blocked. |
3 |
|
Carlo
Solo traveller
Norwich,
United Kingdom
June 1, 2009
|
The hotel is definetly not as good as presented on its web site, furniture and walls are old and need some work... however, there is everythig, and for 35 pounds per night in london is still a very good deal. Queensway is really a nice area.. |
6.5 |
|
Bernadeta
Group
Doncaster,
United Kingdom
May 29, 2009
|
The location was very good. Close to all transport links and in the central part of London, which was excelent. The location of our room was not good at all. The room was located on the lower ground and the views through the window was horrible, overlooking some basement. |
7 |
|
Ingbritt
Family with young children
Asmundtorp,
Sweden
May 27, 2009
|
We were very disappointed about the standard of the rooms, they were very narrow and with a poor view into a backyard wall. We were also astonished about charging fees for taking care of a small luggage when we left, this should be included in a normal service. |
4 |
|
Jennifer
With friends
MELROSE,
United Kingdom
May 27, 2009
|
The hotel was conveniently situated close to a London Underground Tube station, it was also close to Kensington Park Gardens. The hotel is situated away from the main roads and is very peaceful. The lack of bar facilities, it would have been better had we been able to have a pre or post dinner drink. |
7.5 |
|
Helen
Solo traveller
Whitley Bay,
United Kingdom
May 25, 2009
|
Location only plus point. I have no idea how this hotel has three stars. It is the worst hotel we hav ever stayed in and thank goodness it was only for one night. Do not stay here. |
2.5 |
|
Peter
Solo traveller
POOLE,
United Kingdom
May 25, 2009
|
Clean and comfortable and good value for money. Central location close to underground. |
7.5 |
|
Agneta
Mature couple
Mölndal,
Sweden
May 24, 2009
|
The room was dyrty and the shower was full of mould |
4.5 |
|
Anonymous
Young couple
Finland
May 23, 2009
|
The room was nice and the bathroom was clean and renovated. For breakfast there was only cereal and lots of marmalade with toast and croissants. Something not so sugared would have been nice. The windows in the room could have used some renovation. |
8 |
|
Botond
Young couple
Budapest,
Hungary
May 22, 2009
|
Good loacation, Queenswaytube station is five mintes walk. Clean, but very very little rooms, the double bed is also very little. Continental breakfest is poor. |
4 |
|
John
Mature couple
Winfield , Il,
United States of America
May 19, 2009
|
convienent and reasonable price |
7 |
|
Oscar
With friends
Arganda del Rey,
Spain
May 19, 2009
|
The best thing of this hotel is its situation near Hyde Park.Also there are two lines of the underground. Very expensive, the rooms are smalls,darks, wet, dirty...The breakfast is not good, and on this hotel is the first time I paid to keep my case...on any hotel I stayed never cost me... |
3 |
|
Penelope
With friends
MADRID,
Spain
May 16, 2009
|
Good location, quiet area but close to all touristic places by bus ( 5min ) The hotel is just enough, not beautiful, no luxurious, but enough to sleep and taking a shower. Good breakfast. |
6 |
|
Bente
Family with older children
OSLO,
Norway
May 9, 2009
|
The location and rate. The room was clean, nice bathroom. The room was small but OK for 3 nights. The breakfast was boring with only jam, some ham and cheese would have been nice. |
8 |
|
Neil
Young couple
Torfaen,
United Kingdom
May 9, 2009
|
Location and value for money was excellent. Only minor, unimportant things such as small lifts and tiresome stairs. Rooms were small along with the bathroom, but an excellent value for money base from which to explore London. |
8.5 |
|
Kate
Solo traveller
Manchester,
United Kingdom
May 6, 2009
|
Location was good, very close to main city transport. Also a lot of local shops near by. |
7.5 |
The guest reviews express the personal opinions of Booking.com customers who filled out a questionaire after their stay at the hotel. These opinions do not necessarily represent the views of Booking.com.
Customers viewing this hotel are often interested in these hotels as well:
Blakemore Hotel  This partly refurbished Victorian hotel is in central London, 5 minutes’ walk from Hyde Park, Kensington Gardens and Bayswater / Queensway London Underground stations. |
St Giles Hotel & Leisure Club Perhaps the most central hotel in London, located in the heart of the West End at the foot of Oxford Street with the whole of London on your doorstep. |
Hyde Park Executive Apartments  These stylishly designed, short-stay apartments occupy a prestigious location on the north side of Hyde Park, close to several underground stations and bus services to the City and West End. |
Central Park Hotel Next to Hyde Park and close to Kensington Gardens, Central Park Hotel has a convenient location and excellent transport links. |
){kind=link}
){kind=link}